Thursday, December 20, 2018

Raja Ravi Varma

5ef97df0bf64e7816bb164fc8d19a6c5

Source : Google photo of Raja Ravi Varma

One of the famous artists of India is Raja Ravi Varma who is well known to the world. His dazzling style and color, use of middle class Indian women for his paintings and his depiction of religious figures of  Radha and Krishna puts him in a category all by itself.

Raja Ravi Varma (29 April 1848 – 2 October 1906) was a celebrated Indian Malayali painter and artist. He is considered among the greatest painters in the history of Indian art for a number of aesthetic and broader social reasons.

Firstly, his works are held to be among the best examples of the fusion of European techniques with a purely Indian sensibility. While continuing the tradition and aesthetics of Indian art, his paintings employed the latest European academic art techniques of the day. Secondly, he was notable for making affordable lithographs of his paintings available to the public, which greatly enhanced his reach and influence as a painter and public figure.

Indeed, his lithographs increased the involvement of common people with fine arts and defined artistic tastes among common people for several decades. In particular, his depictions of Hindu deities and episodes from the epics and Puranas have received profound acceptance from the public and are found, often as objects of worship, across the length and breadth of India. ( Source : Wikipedia)

Raja Ravi Varma was closely related to the royal family of Travancore of present day Kerala state in India. Later in his life, two of his granddaughters were adopted into that royal family, and their descendants comprise the totality of the present royal family of Travancore, including the latest three Maharajas (Balarama Varma IIIMarthanda Varma III and Rama Varma VII).

Raja Ravi Varma was born M. R. Ry. Ravi Varma, Koil Thampuran of Kilimanoor at Kilimanoor palace in the erstwhile princely state of Travancore (present-day Kerala) into an aristocratic family that for over 200 years produced consorts for the princesses of the matrilineal Travancore royal family. The title Raja was conferred as a personal title by the Viceroy and Governor-General of India.



This is a painting by Raja Ravi Varma of his daughter Mahaprabha and her son.

I have put together his most notable paintings in the power point below for your enjoyment.



Link : https://1drv.ms/p/s!AmoX9W4gHulzki7_T6zURSgtTL0M

<iframe src="https://onedrive.live.com/embed?cid=73E91E206EF5176A&resid=73E91E206EF5176A%212350&authkey=AIQ_PZmZok0OSGo&em=2" width="402" height="327" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>




This painting known as The lady with the lamp was wrongly attributed to Raja Ravi Varma and it was actually painted by another very good artist called H.R.Haldankar with the title Glow of hope. The painting above is a remarkable copy of the original done by an unknown artist in Kerala . It is painted on a bamboo screen and is very impressive so I bought it in a small town during our trip through South India.

I have included the original painting in the power point with the note that Raja Ravi Varma was not the artist of that particular painting. He painted Mona Lisa copying from the original so it is included as well because of its quality and resemblance.


Note :  My blogs are also available in French, Spanish, German and Japanese  languages at the following links :

tumblr posts  
Blogs in French
Blogs in Spanish
Blogs in German
Blogs in Japanese
Anil’s biography in Japanese
Anil’s biography in French.
Anil’s biography in English.
Anil’s biography in Spanish.
Anil’s biography in German
http://achtrjee.wixsite.com/mysite/blog

Subscribe

Monday, December 17, 2018

Jean Ferrat is a legend

arton23586

Source : Google photo of Jean Ferrat

Synopsis : This blog is about a well loved singer Jean Ferrat who left his imprint on the French conscience permanently though his songs and made them aware of all the injustices in the world but he also sang about the beauty and love.






                                               https://youtu.be/Ol2nMHF0A2s
                                       The most beautiful songs of Jean Ferrat




https://youtu.be/Otdj8WCdaac?list=PLeL3JfN-wERcCpuvVHBFfZoSih06dfNEo

                                   The most poignant songs that touch your heart

Ferrat was born in Vaucresson, Hauts-de-Seine, the youngest of four children from a modest family which moved to Versailles in 1935, where Ferrat studied at the Jules Ferry College. His Russian-born father (naturalized in 1928) was forced to wear the yellow star and deported to Auschwitz in 1942, where he died.

In the early 1950s, he started in Parisian cabaret. After that he avoided any particular musical style, but remained faithful to himself, his friends and his public. In 1956, he set "Les yeux d'Elsa" ("Elsa's eyes"), a Louis Aragon poem which Ferrat loved, to music. Its rendition by popular artist André Claveau brought Ferrat some initial recognition as a songwriter.

His first 45 RPM single was released in 1958, without success. It was not until 1959, with publisher Gérard Meys, who also became his close friend and associate, that his career started to flourish. He signed with Decca and released his second single, "Ma Môme", in 1960 under the musical direction of Meys.

In 1961, Ferrat married Christine Sèvres, a singer who performed some of his songs. She died in 1981 at age 50. He met Alain Goraguer, who became an arranger of his songs. His debut album, Deux Enfants du Soleil, was released that year. Ferrat also wrote songs for Zizi Jeanmaire and went on the road, sharing billing with her at the Alhambra for six months.

Nuit et Brouillard ("Night and Fog"), which followed in 1963, was awarded the Académie Charles Cros's Grand Prix du Disque and showed any topic could be put in songs.[2] Ferrat toured again in 1965, but stopped performing on stage in 1973.

In 1990, he received an award from the Société des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique, (SACEM) the French association of songwriters, composers and music publishers.
In 2010, Ferrat died following a long illness at the age of 79. He lived in Antraigues-sur-Volane, a small village of not even 700 people in Ardeche.   ( source : Wikipedia)


I first learned of Jean Ferrat when I was in Algeria where I got to listen to his records at my friend Yves' house and was mesmerized by the richness of his voice and the beauty of his words that he sang with such great passion. Yves and I enjoyed many evenings listening to Jean Ferrat in stereo . Later when I visited Paris, a friend brought me to the FNAC record shop where I bought my first album of Jean Ferrat that I brought to India where my brother learned to appreciate his rich voice although he could not understand French.

I am so sad that he died in 2010 at the age of 79 because there will not ever be another Jean Ferrat. His songs live on in France and other French speaking countries . His songs gave life to the songs written by Aragon and has eternalized them the only way Jean Ferrat could.





                                                 https://youtu.be/7c8DBuPtGvU

This song called  Un air de liberte was sung during the war in Vietnam where I served for two years as a volunteer agronomist so I was particularly impressed by its message that all France understood and protested against the war there. He made the atrocities in Vietnam war known through his soulful songs. He sang about Pablo Neruda and about many who fought for freedom and suffered.


Here are the lyrics of the song and its translation
Un air de liberte



The wars of lies of colonial wars
It is you and your kind who are guardians
When you approve them in long news papers
Your pen signed thirty years of misfortune


The earth does not like blood or garbage
Agrippa d'Aubigné said it in his time
Your cause already smelled of rot
And it is this stink that you find pleasant


[Refrain]
Ah sir d'Ormesson
You dare to declare
That an air of freedom
Floating on Saigon
Before this city is called Ho Chi Minh City



[Verse 2]
Lying on the rails we stopped the trains
For you and your kind we were the vermin
On whom your police could hit without braking
But the streets resounded with peace in Indochina

Nous disions que la guerre était perdue d'avance
Et cent mille Français allaient mourir en vain

Contre un peuple luttant pour son indépendance
Oui vous avez un peu de ce sang sur les mains

We said that the war was lost in advance
And a hundred thousand Frenchmen were going to die in vain
Against a people fighting for independence
Yes you have some of that blood on your hands


Refrain]
Ah sir d'Ormesson
You dare to declare
That an air of freedom
Floating on Saigon
Before this city is called Ho Chi Minh City


[Verse 3]
After thirty years of fire of suffering and tears
Millions of hectares of defoliated land
A futile genocide perpetrated in Vietnam
When the cannon is silent you continue


But look at you one morning in the mirror
Patron du Figaro think of Beaumarchais
He jumps from his grave by making a face
The masters still have the soul of a valet 

I love Jean Ferrat because he sang against the cruelty of war and the sufferance of people under dictators of this world. He was an activist and brought awareness of war and misery through his songs. His own father was executed in Auschwitz by the Nazis so he knew all about suffering.

I listen to his songs from time to time and think of all that has changed since I first heard Jean Ferrat in Mostaganem in 1971. Yves has disappeared and is lost to me. Our mother's house in India has been sold and I do not know what happened to my Jean Ferrat LP records and the stereo. I have become old and live in a different country now. Jean Ferrat himself has died reminding us all that nothing is permanent in this life. Like fallen leaves , we are all swept away by the wind of time but singers like Jean Ferrat will endure. His songs and lyrics are engraved in the heart of all who loved him and his music.


Note :  My blogs are also available in French, Spanish, German and Japanese  languages at the following links :

tumblr posts  
Blogs in French
Blogs in Spanish
Blogs in German
Blogs in Japanese
Anil’s biography in Japanese
Anil’s biography in French.
Anil’s biography in English.
Anil’s biography in Spanish.
Anil’s biography in German
http://achtrjee.wixsite.com/mysite/blog


Subscribe

Monday, December 10, 2018

Xenophobia



xenophobia-in-south-africa

Source : Google photo of xenophobia in South Africa

Synopsis : Xenophobia is the baseless fear of other people who are not like you but it can be overcome with knowledge and understanding of others and their culture. Xenophobia is a crime against humanity.


I had a very interesting experience in Sicily once when I walked into a campsite by mistake near Messina that was for the Italians. Naturally they were surprised to see an Indian like me with a back pack just walk in so it was a first for them. They had never seen a real Indian up close. The children were the most curious and they swarmed around me and started chattering in Italian which I do not speak so all I could say was non parlare italiano but it did not stop them.

I noticed that there were a lot of kids of various ages starting from very young to may be a few in their teens who looked at me curiously while their mothers and grandmothers kept an eye on them  and sweetly smiled at me. There were no adult males that I could see anywhere so I figured it was a baby-sitting camp for the kids while their fathers went somewhere to soak up the night life or play with their steel balls.

I also noticed that they were extremely friendly and they all wanted to know all about me which was hard for me to explain but finally a teenage girl of about 12 or 13 years of age came forward and shyly said that she spoke a bit of English and could be of some assistance so I was greatly relieved because my Italian was going nowhere.

Once they learned that I was really an Indian from India and not a tribe found in the Amazon, their curiosity peaked because none had ever travelled anywhere and had absolutely no knowledge whatsoever about another country so it was a very first for them. I also noticed that they needed attention which was in short supply because the mothers and the grandmothers were busy chatting or doing other things.

So an idea came to me and I thought I could teach these kids a new game that was simple to learn and play. I explained to the teenager that this game was very simple. First we should all join hands and form a circle and then sit down on the ground. She explained this to the kids in rapid fire Italian so their eyes sparkled in excitement not knowing what will come next.

After they all sat down, I got a handkerchief and placed it secretly behind one unsuspecting kid and continued to circle them until I came to the kid, picked up the hand kerchief and hit him with it signaling that he was out of the game. If the kid found the kerchief before I could reach him, I was out of the game and he continued running behind the kids and placed the kerchief somewhere.

Now the kids understood the basics and were thoroughly excited so the game continued to the cheer of everybody. Now the kids understood that they were not supposed to look behind them to find the kerchief but no one told them that they could not feel so everyone started to feel behind them if there was a hand kerchief.

The game was fun and hilarious so the kids enjoyed it tremendously. The women looked on and smiled and one of them asked me to take off my shirt so I was a bit surprised but took it off and gave it to her. She had noticed a few missing buttons in my shirt so she brought out her sewing kit and put on new buttons for me very lovingly.

I was totally amazed at their friendliness and so welcoming nature. Needless to say I had never experienced such welcome in any foreign country except in Japan and in the United States. I should also include Algeria.

But the kids were not finished with me and asked me to play with them more but I did not have the unlimited energy of kids so I sat down under a tree in an easy chair and closed my eyes for a minute or so. Now the kids brought all kinds of food from their tents and started to stuff it into my mouth. Someone put cheese in my mouth while others put grapes or other things. I mean there was this tussle among them to feed me.

Finally it was time for me to move on so I got up and said good bye. Now the kids started to shed copious tears and pleaded for me to stay because they had opened their heart to me and would not let me go.  Believe me when I say that it was very hard for me to leave so I left with a heavy heart and still remember their tearful faces. When they knew that I had to go, they all started to kiss my cheek one by one.

I had to tell you this story here because my topic is Xenophobia or fear of strangers that I saw in many countries during my years of travel. It is perhaps the human nature that we are afraid of the unknown and are fearful of what the unknown may portend. You may be afraid to explore an unexplored cave deep underground not knowing the dangers that may lurk there. You may be afraid to try a new kind of food or a drink you never had before. You may be afraid of heights or haunted places.

But these are normal fears we all experience sometime or other. Xenophobia is the fear of people that is the strangest of all because it is not only based on ignorance; it is often deeply rooted in the culture where you come from. Xenophobia is based on a deep sense of malaise about strangers who are very different from you and who represent someone whom you had no previous experience with.

But those Italian kids were not xenophobic at all so they were very friendly to me and shed tears when I left. The older women accepted me with a smile and repaired my missing buttons. What then makes people xenophobic in some countries?

I used to think that the language barrier is a hurdle we all face when we travel abroad but those kids loved me even if I did not speak their language because I taught them a new game and played with them. So language is not necessarily a barrier as I learned in Japan.

The adults are far more complicated than the kids because at a certain age, the kids are very innocent but the adults are not so they start forming their own opinions about strangers and absorb all the negativity they receive from their friends and relatives who are xenophobic.

This is the dark side of us all that some politicians exploit to gain an audience and their support to gain a few votes. Hitler could put a huge crowd into frenzy while shouting from his podium reading from Mein Kampf who would then go on a rampage through the Jewish quarters and maul them physically. This was an extreme example of Xenophobia.

Remember the pogroms in Russia in the movie Fiddler on the roof? That was xenophobia. Often it is related to religious intolerance so Hitler said that the Jews were bad because they were not Christians so they should be literally eliminated but when the Khmer Rouge killed their own people in Cambodia in 1974, what do you call it?

It is also xenophobia based on political ideology so there are many kinds of xenophobia. I gave the example of the Italian children who were innocent and had no knowledge of racism or xenophobia but later in their life who can tell what they would become? The Italians supported Mussolini who persecuted Jews in Italy and was in cahoots with Hitler.

I have written about people in many countries where they treated me well and were friendly and in others not so friendly. When someone exploits this fear in people of others to gain political advantage like Hitler and makes people xenophobic then the result can only be catastrophic as the history teaches us.

What surprises me the most about people is that this fear of people is baseless because it is based on certain assumptions that are false. People may be different from you and me but that does not make them inferior to us in any way.

I will mention a tragic example of xenophobia in India that some Moslem politician stoked to create a Moslem state of Pakistan where he would be the President. This led to a massacre of hundreds of thousands of people both Hindus and Moslems during the partition of India in 1947 because someone sowed the seed of this hatred among them using religion as the basis for political gains.

Interestingly the Hindus, Moslems, Sikhs and Christians all fought together under the banner of the Indian national Army led by Netaji Bose who became the first Prime Minister of Independent India in 1944. That independence did not last but people of all religions fought as one under Bose whom they all revered. There was no hatred between them because Bose said that we are all Indians first.

Now some politicians are at the dirty game once again and are trying to sow the seed of hatred and intolerance for the immigrants among their rabid supporters who are bent on taking xenophobia to the next level. You will see the resurgence of xenophobia in some parts of Europe where the skin heads routinely beat up African migrants or war refugees because they do not want them.

The migrant caravans of thousands of South and Central Americans pressing against the barbed wire fence of the United States are greeted with tear gas and water cannons because they do not want them. It does not matter if there are women, children and people in wheel chairs seeking asylum because they are fleeing their homeland due to persecution and violence. They are met with violence at the border because of xenophobia.

The Moslem villagers are killed and their villages are burned to the ground by the mobs in Myanmar because of xenophobia. The UN estimates the number of refugees fleeing their homeland due to war and persecution in millions who have nowhere to go. Nobody wants them.

I always write that the ignorance based fear of other people can be remedied through education but who is to provide that education to people who have made up their mind? Who is to bring knowledge about other people to them and show them that all people are wonderful? I have written many blogs about the Africans to show how wonderful they are and how wonderful their culture and traditions are.

To give up your fear of others, you have to learn about them. You will find that such fears are baseless. I have lived and worked in many Moslem countries where I found them so nice to me. Their mind was not poisoned by the politicians there about me being a Hindu so they welcomed me and invited me to their festivals, to their homes and showered their hospitality on me but sadly such things could not happen in my own country.

Once I was on my way to Mascara in the Mostaganem province of Algeria when the rains came soaking me thoroughly so I sought shelter under an awning near the road. A couple invited me to their home and offered me hot coffee and later food because they saw that I was getting wet. It did not matter to them that I was a Hindu and they were Moslems. We were just people. I was overwhelmed by their kindness and hospitality although I was a stranger to them.

So the key is to remember that we are all human beings and respond to kindness and generosity. It is the human nature to smile when someone smiles at you even if you do not know that person. That show of kindness and smile breaks down all barriers so you gain a new friend.

When we remember that after all we are all brothers and sisters, it goes a long way to overcome the initial fear that leads to xenophobia so smile at a stranger, give him or her a helping hand, show your generosity by offering food and drinks . You will be pleasantly surprised at the results.


Note :  My blogs are also available in French, Spanish, German and Japanese  languages at the following links :

tumblr posts    
Blogs in French
Blogs in Spanish
Blogs in German
Blogs in Japanese
Anil’s biography in Japanese
Anil’s biography in French.
Anil’s biography in English.
Anil’s biography in Spanish.
Anil’s biography in German
http://achtrjee.wixsite.com/mysite/blog


Subscribe




























Saturday, December 8, 2018

Who was Siraj-ud-Daulah?






Source : Google photo of Siraj-ud- Daulah ( Last king of Bengal )

Synopsis :  Very few know of Siraj- ud- Daulah who was the last king of Bengal . He was defeated by Robert Clive in the battle of Plassey on 1757 due to the betrayal of his generals in the battle field. All those people including Siraj died pitifully in the hands of assassins or committed suicide thus ending his rule and the start of the British East India Company that was the precursor to the British empire one hundred years later. 


I have always wanted to write about Siraj- ud- Daulah. He was a historical figure in India and so was Robert Clive. Clive's decisive victory over Siraj in the battle of Plassey was the start of the expansion of the British East India Co. that later paved the way for England to claim the entire country as its colony with direct rule from England in 1857.
Siraj Ud Daula had ordered his army to attack the Fort Williams in Kolkata to put an end to the British expansion in India and captured the fort with more than 150 British inside. They were put in a small room where most of them died of suffocation. This was the infamous Black hole of Fort Williams incident that Clive later took revenge of during the battle of Plassey.


Source : Google photo of Black hole in Fort Williams in Kolkata , Bengal, India


Robert Clive became enormously rich through his dealings in India that led him back to England where he was investigated for his illegally acquired wealth through shoddy practices there so he committed suicide fearing the consequences of the parliamentary investigations. Little did he know that they were considering a promotion for him as the Governor General of the British colonies in North America as a reward for his services in India.

This is however, the story of Siraj- ud- Daulah, the last king of Bengal and Clive's victory. I have sourced this story mostly from Wikipedia that gives a great deal of detail .

Battle of Plassey : 

The Battle of Plassey was a decisive victory of the British East India Company over the Nawab of Bengal and his French allies on 23 June 1757, under the leadership of Robert Clive. The battle consolidated the Company's presence in Bengal, which later expanded to cover much of India over the next hundred years.

The battle took place at Palashi (Anglicised version: Plassey) on the banks of the Hooghly River, about 150 kilometres (93 mi) north of Calcutta and south of Murshidabad, then capital of Bengal (now in Murshidabad district in West Bengal). The belligerents were the Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah, the last independent Nawab of Bengal, and the British East India Company. Siraj-ud-Daulah had become the Nawab of Bengal the year before, and he ordered the English to stop the extension of their fortification. Robert Clive bribed Mir Jafar, the commander-in-chief of the Nawab's army, and also promised him to make him Nawab of Bengal. Clive defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah at Plassey in 1757 and captured Calcutta.

The battle was preceded by an attack on British-controlled Calcutta by Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah and the Black Hole massacre. The British sent reinforcements under Colonel Robert Clive and Admiral Charles Watson from Madras to Bengal and recaptured Calcutta. Clive then seized the initiative to capture the French  fort of Chandernagar. Tensions and suspicions between Siraj-ud-daulah and the British culminated in the Battle of Plassey. The battle was waged during the Seven Years' War (1756–1763), and, in a mirror of their European rivalry, the French East India Company (La Compagnie des Indes Orientales) sent a small contingent to fight against the British.

Siraj-ud-Daulah had a numerically superior force and made his last stand at Plassey. The British, worried about being outnumbered, formed a conspiracy with Siraj-ud-Daulah's demoted army chief Mir Jafar, along with others such as Yar Lutuf Khan, Jagat Seths (Mahtab Chand and Swarup Chand), Umichand and Rai Durlabh. Mir Jafar, Rai Durlabh and Yar Lutuf Khan thus assembled their troops near the battlefield but made no move to actually join the battle. Siraj-ud-Daulah's army with 50,000 soldiers, 40 cannons and 10 war elephants was defeated by 3,000 soldiers of Col. Robert Clive, owing to the flight of Siraj-ud-Daulah from the battlefield and the inactivity of the conspirators. The battle ended in 11 hours.

This is judged to be one of the pivotal battles in the control of Indian subcontinent by the colonial powers. The British now wielded enormous influence over the Nawab and consequently acquired significant concessions for previous losses and revenue from trade. The British further used this revenue to increase their military might and push the other European colonial powers such as the Dutch and the French out of South Asia, thus expanding the British Empire.



                            Source : Google photo of Alivardi Khan , Nabab of Bengal

The Mughal Empire's Nawab of Bengal Alivardi Khan adopted strict attitudes towards European mercantile companies in Bengal.




                         Source : Google painting of Mughal emperor Farrukshiyar


Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar adopted a lenient policy towards the British East India CompanyAlwardi Khan ascended to the throne of the Nawab of Bengal after his army attacked and captured the capital of Bengal, Murshidabad. Aliwardi's attitude to the Europeans in Bengal is said to be strict. During his wars with the Marathas, he allowed the strengthening of fortifications by the Europeans and the construction of the Maratha Ditch  in Calcutta by the British. On the other hand, he collected large amounts of money from them for the upkeep of his war.

He was well-informed of the situation in southern India, where the British and the French had started a proxy war using the local princes and rulers. Alwardi did not wish such a situation to transpire in his province and thus exercised caution in his dealings with the Europeans. However, there was continual friction; the British always complained that they were prevented from the full enjoyment of the farman of 1717 issued by Farrukhsiyar. The British, however, protected subjects of the Nawab, gave passes to native traders to trade custom-free and levied large duties on goods coming to their districts – actions which were detrimental to the Nawab's revenue

In April 1756, Alwardi Khan died and was succeeded by his twenty-three-year-old grandson, Siraj-ud-daulah. His personality was said to be a combination of a ferocious temper and a feeble understanding. He was particularly suspicious of the large profits made by the European companies in India. When the British and the French started improving their fortifications in anticipation of another war between them, he immediately ordered them to stop such activities as they had been done without permission. When the British refused to cease their constructions, the Nawab led a detachment of 3,000 men to surround the fort and factory of Cossimbazar and took several British officials as prisoners, before moving to Calcutta. ( Kolkata)

The defences of Calcutta were weak and negligible so the army of Siraj occupied it on 16 June , 1756 and the fort surrendered after a brief siege on 20 June.
The prisoners who were captured at the siege of Calcutta were transferred by Siraj to the care of the officers of his guard, who confined them to the common dungeon of Fort William known as The Black Hole. This dungeon, 18 by 14 feet (5.5 m × 4.3 m) in size with two small windows, had 146 prisoners thrust into it – originally employed by the British to hold only six prisoners.

On 21 June, the doors of the dungeon were opened and only 23 of the 146 walked out, the rest died of asphyxiation, heat exhaustion and delirium. It appears that the Nawab was unaware of the conditions in which his prisoners were held which resulted in the unfortunate deaths of most of the prisoners. Meanwhile, the Nawab's army and navy were busy plundering the city of Calcutta and the other British factories in the surrounding areas.

When news of the fall of Calcutta broke in Madras on 16 August 1756, the Council immediately sent out an expeditionary force under Colonel Clive and Admiral Watson. A letter from the Council of Fort St. George, states that "the object of the expedition was not merely to re-establish the British settlements in Bengal, but also to obtain ample recognition of the Company's privileges and reparation for its losses" without the risk of war. It also states that any signs of dissatisfaction and ambition among the Nawab's subjects must be supported.

Clive assumed command of the land forces, consisting of 900 Europeans and 1500 sepoys while Watson commanded a naval squadron. He easily retook Kolkata and started the final push to punish Siraj-ud-Daula that ended in the battle of Plassey later.

Bengal campaign


Source : Wikipedia photo of Robert Clive (1773), by Nathaniel Dance-Holland

After retaking Kolkata, the army of Clive then attacked the surrounding areas outside the city that Siraj-ud-Daulah failed to protect and retreated back to his capital of Murshidabad. Clive emboldned by his success now turned his attention to the French in Chandarnagar where he laid siege and defeated the French.

Conspiracy :



                                       Source : Google painting of Emperor Alamgir

Siraj believed that the Mughal Emperor Alamgir II had not given permission to the British East India Company to expand its influence in Bengal.

The Nawab was infuriated on learning of the attack on Chandernagar. His former hatred of the British returned, but he now felt the need to strengthen himself by alliances against the British. The Nawab was plagued by fear of attack from the north by the Afghans under Ahmad Shah Durrani and from the west by the Marathas.

Therefore, he could not deploy his entire force against the British for fear of being attacked from the flanks. A deep distrust set in between the British and the Nawab. As a result, Siraj started secret negotiations with Jean Law, chief of the French factory at Cossimbazar, and de Bussy. The Nawab also moved a large division of his army under Rai Durlabh to Plassey, on the island of Cossimbazar 30 miles (48 km) south of Murshidabad.

Popular discontent against the Nawab flourished in his own court. The Seths, the traders of Bengal, were in perpetual fear for their wealth under the reign of Siraj, contrary to the situation under Alivardi's reign. They had engaged Yar Lutuf Khan to defend them in case they were threatened in any way. William Watts, the Company representative at the court of Siraj, informed Clive about a conspiracy at the court to overthrow the ruler. The conspirators included Mir Jafar, paymaster of the army, Rai Durlabh, Yar Lutuf Khan and Omichund, a merchant and several officers in the army.

When communicated in this regard by Mir Jafar, Clive referred it to the select committee in Calcutta on 1 May. The committee passed a resolution in support of the alliance. A treaty was drawn between the British and Mir Jafar to raise him to the throne of the Nawab in return for support to the British in the field of battle and the bestowal of large sums of money upon them as compensation for the attack on Calcutta. On 2 May, Clive broke up his camp and sent half the troops to Calcutta and the other half to Chandernagar.

Mir Jafar and the Seths desired that the confederacy between the British and himself be kept secret from Omichund, but when he found out about it, he threatened to betray the conspiracy if his share was not increased to three million rupees (£300,000). Omichund was given a fake promise by the British they had no itention of keeping so Omichund lost his mental balance and became insane.

Clive testified and defended himself  before the House of Commons of Parliament on 10 May 1773, during the Parliamentary inquiry into his conduct in India. He justified his action of treachery to win support of Mir Jafar who was crucial in the forthcoming battle at Plassey. It was Mir Jafar who betrayed Siraj-ud-Daulah in the battle field where Siraj lost the battle and fled.

Approach march




Source : Wikipedia photo of Clive's solitary reflection before the Battle of Plassey

Europeans with the supplies and artillery were towed up the river in 200 boats. On 14 June, Clive sent a declaration of war to Siraj. On 15 June, after ordering an attack on Mir Jafar's palace in suspicion of his alliance with the British, Siraj obtained a promise from Mir Jafar to not join the British in the field of battle. He then ordered his entire army to move to Plassey, but the troops refused to quit the city until the arrears of their pay were released. The delay caused the army to reach Plassey only by 21 June.

Clive on his way to Plassey found large stores of grains and military supplies in Katwa Fort that had been abandoned by Siraj's forces in a hurry. Now his troops in high spirit and with abundant supplies , Clive pushed on to Plassey where the final battle took place.

Battle of Plassey:  June 23, 1757




                                Source : Wikipedia photo of the battle of Plassey

The battle of Plassey was short lived. The superior army of Siraj-ud-Daulah was defeated by a very inferior army of Clive because Mir Jafar as their general refused to give the order to fight at a crucial juncture and advised Siraj to flee.

Death of Mir Madan Khan:

Only Mir Madan Khan proved to be loyal to Siraj-ud-Daulah so his troops continued the fight  but he was killed in the battle that convinced Siraj that he must retreat to his capital.



Source : Wikipedia photo of English guns at The battle of Plassey, June 23, 1757

The British losses were estimated at 22 killed and 50 wounded. Of the killed, three were of the Madras Artillery, one of the Madras Regiment and one of the Bengal European Regiment. Of the wounded, four were of the 39th Regiment, three of the Madras Regiment, four of the Madras Artillery, two of the Bengal European Regiment, one of the Bengal Artillery and one of the Bombay Regiment. Of the losses by the sepoys, four Madras and nine Bengal sepoys were killed while nineteen Madras and eleven Bengal sepoys were wounded. Clive estimates that the Nawab's force lost 500 men, including several key officers including Mir Madan Khan.

Aftermath:

After losing the battle Siraj-ud-Daulah tried to escape west while Clive placed Mir Jafar on the throne and acknowledging his position as Nawab, presented him with a plate of gold rupees. Eventually Siraj was captured and murdered by the son of Mir Jafar.
Clive then demanded restitution to the tune of 22,000,000 Rupees ( 2,750,000 pounds) for his losses that were insignificant and got paid in gold and jewelries from the treasury of Siraj that was now under the control of Mir Jafar.

According to the treaty drawn between the British and Mir Jafar, the British acquired all the land within the Maratha Ditch and 600 yards (550 m) beyond it and the zamindari of all the land between Calcutta and the sea. Besides confirming the firman of 1717, the treaty also required the restitution, including donations to the navy squadron, army and committee, of 22,000,000 rupees (£2,750,000) to the British for their losses.

As a result of the war of Plassey, the French were no longer a significant force in Bengal. In 1759, the British defeated a larger French garrison at Masulipatam, securing the Northern Circars. By 1759, Mir Jafar felt that his position as a subordinate to the British could not be tolerated. He started encouraging the Dutch to advance against the British and eject them from Bengal. In late 1759, the Dutch sent seven large ships and 1400 men from Java to Bengal under the pretext of reinforcing their Bengal settlement of Chinsura even though Britain and Holland were not officially at war.

Clive, however, initiated immediate offensive operations by land and sea and defeated the much larger Dutch force on 25 November 1759 in the Battle of Chinsura. The British then deposed Mir Jafar and installed Mir Qasim as the Nawab of Bengal. The British were now the paramount European power in Bengal. When Clive returned to England due to ill-health, he was rewarded with an Irish peerage, as Lord Clive, Baron of Plassey and also obtained a seat in the British House of Commons.

Economic effects :

The Battle of Plassey and the resultant victory of the British East India company led to puppet governments instated by them in various states of India. This led to an unleashing of excesses, malpractices and atrocities by the British East India Company in the name of tax collection.

The battlefield today:



Source : Wikipedia photos of Obelisk near Palashi battlefield, Bengal, India



Source : Google photo of the Palace of Siraj Ud Daula in Murshidabad, Bengal, India

  

Source : Tomb of Siraj Ud Daula in Murshidabad, Bengal, India

Today a few tourists wander through the streets of Murshidabad and gawk at the opulent palace and the grounds and wonder who was Siraj-ud-Daulah. It is now a dimly remembered chapter of the Indian history that the young generation pays scant attention to. His unpainted mausoleum will be shown to you where the king sleeps in eternity in a simple undecorated grave.


------------------------------------------------------------

(1) “Firman of 1717”: In 1714, an Englishman, John Surman, was sent to the Delhi Court to secure commercial facilities for the company.

He managed to obtain a “firman in 1717” from Emperor Farukhshiyar.
The East India Company obtained valuable privileges in 1717 under the royal government
What is the Farman? It is a subsidy granted by Farrukhsiyar, which was achieved by the British East India Company. The delegation of the Company was very well considered in the royal court of Farrukhsiyar. In April 1717, the farmer (subsidy) of the emperor was issued, which complied with all the requests that the Company had made in their petitions. 

Permission was granted to buy 38 villages around the three already owned by the company (Sutanuti, Gobindapur and Kalikata, the predecessor of modern Calcutta). The Company also received commercial privileges in Bengal and additional fortification in Calcutta. This grant was instrumental in the creation of companies and the colonization of Bengal, which would then be followed by the rest of India by the East India Company.
The Company was allowed to make commercial transactions in Bengal, Bombay and Madras duty-free. The Company was also allowed to mint its own coins.

The Nawabs of Bengal, however, showed little respect for “the imperial farmer.” He granted the Company the freedom to export and import its products in Bengal without paying taxes. Right to issue passes or dastaks for the movements of said assets.

Company employees were also allowed to trade, but were not covered by this farmer. They had to pay the same taxes as the Indian merchants. — This “farmer”, grant or subsidy, (Farman) was a perpetual source of conflict between the Company and the Nawabs of Bengal. All the Nawabs of Bengal, from Mushid Quli Khan to Alivardi Khan, had opposed the English interpretation of the “firman of 1717”. They had forced the Company to pay sums to their treasury, and they firmly suppressed the misuse of the dastaks.


Note :  My blogs are also available in French, Spanish, German and Japanese  languages at the following links :


Subscribe